Current Version
| Region | United States |
| Issue | LGBT discrimination |
| Status | Varies by Region |
| Start Date | Jun 26, 2015 |
| End Date | (none) |
| Description | Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees. Tennessee has laws for LGBTQ discrimination, thus being varies by region even though its federally protected |
| Sources | https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/644/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160610201120/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1618_hfci.pdf |
👍 NEW: Helpful votes! You can now rate each edit as helpful or unhelpful. Votes add another layer of approval and are an easy way to say thank you to other editors. Helpful votes may become public in the future but unhelpful votes will always remain private.
Revision History (2)
| Old Value (Original) | New Value (Current) | |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Illegal in some contexts | (REMOVED) |
| Special Status | Illegal in some contexts | Varies by Region |
| Description | Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees. | Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees. Tennessee has laws for LGBTQ discrimination, thus being varies by region even though its federally protected |
Show Difference | ||
| Original entry | |
|---|---|
| Status | Illegal in some contexts |
| Start Date | Jun 26, 2015 |
| End Date | (none) |
| Description | Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees. |
| Sources | https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/644/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160610201120/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1618_hfci.pdf |