Current Version
Region | Suriname |
Issue | Same-sex marriage |
Status | Foreign same-sex marriages recognized only |
Start Date | Feb 13, 2025 |
End Date | (none) |
Description | On February 13, 2025, the District Court ordered the Central Civil Affairs Bureau (CBB) to register the marriage of two same-sex couples who married abroad. The ruling, regardless of whether the State appeals or not, must be implemented immediately. The case was filed with the court in October 2023. |
Sources | 2025 court ruling: https://www-dbsuriname-com.translate.goog/2025/02/14/uitspraak-in-civiele-zaak-inzake-inschrijving-huwelijken-partners-hetzelfde-geslacht-bij-cbb/ https://www.culturu.com/nieuws/suriname/rechter-dwingt-cbb-om-huwelijken-van-gelijkgeslacht-in-te-schrijven/ https://abcsuriname.com/kantonrechter-oordeelt-cbb-moet-homo-stellen-inschrijven-in-huwelijksregister/ https://www.nu.nl/buitenland/6345855/suriname-moet-na-vonnis-homo-echtparen-inschrijven-bij-burgerlijke-stand.html https://vids.sr/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Suriname_Civil-Society-Report-FINAL.pdf https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ https://www.dna.sr/media/19726/burgerlijk_wetboek.pdf https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ |
Revision History (6)
edited by DaisyGeekyTrans. Removing information moved to past entry.
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value (Current) | |
---|---|---|
Description | On February 13, 2025, the District Court ordered the Central Civil Affairs Bureau (CBB) to register the marriage of two same-sex couples who married abroad. The ruling, regardless of whether the State appeals or not, must be implemented immediately. The case was filed with the court in October 2023. In 2023, the Constitutional Court of Suriname assessed the decision of the Central Bureau for Civil Affairs (CBB) not to recognize a marriage of a same-sex couple performed in Argentina and ruled that it did not violate Articles 8 and 17(1) of the Constitution. Moreover, the Court ruled that Article 80 of the Suriname Civil Code, which defines marriage as between one man and one woman, must be interpreted to prohibit polygamy rather than same-sex marriage. This interpretation suggests that the article does not inherently conflict with the rights of same-sex couples to marry. | On February 13, 2025, the District Court ordered the Central Civil Affairs Bureau (CBB) to register the marriage of two same-sex couples who married abroad. The ruling, regardless of whether the State appeals or not, must be implemented immediately. The case was filed with the court in October 2023. |
Show Difference |
Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Value | Unrecognized | Foreign same-sex marriages recognized only |
Start Date | (unknown) | Feb 13, 2025 |
Description | In 2023, the Constitutional Court of Suriname assessed the decision of the Central Bureau for Civil Affairs (CBB) not to recognize a marriage of a same-sex couple performed in Argentina and ruled that it did not violate Articles 8 and 17(1) of the Constitution. Moreover, the Court ruled that Article 80 of the Suriname Civil Code, which defines marriage as between one man and one woman, must be interpreted to prohibit polygamy rather than same-sex marriage. This interpretation suggests that the article does not inherently conflict with the rights of same-sex couples to marry. | On February 13, 2025, the District Court ordered the Central Civil Affairs Bureau (CBB) to register the marriage of two same-sex couples who married abroad. The ruling, regardless of whether the State appeals or not, must be implemented immediately. The case was filed with the court in October 2023. In 2023, the Constitutional Court of Suriname assessed the decision of the Central Bureau for Civil Affairs (CBB) not to recognize a marriage of a same-sex couple performed in Argentina and ruled that it did not violate Articles 8 and 17(1) of the Constitution. Moreover, the Court ruled that Article 80 of the Suriname Civil Code, which defines marriage as between one man and one woman, must be interpreted to prohibit polygamy rather than same-sex marriage. This interpretation suggests that the article does not inherently conflict with the rights of same-sex couples to marry. |
Show Difference | ||
Sources | https://vids.sr/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Suriname_Civil-Society-Report-FINAL.pdf https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ https://www.dna.sr/media/19726/burgerlijk_wetboek.pdf https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ | 2025 court ruling: https://www-dbsuriname-com.translate.goog/2025/02/14/uitspraak-in-civiele-zaak-inzake-inschrijving-huwelijken-partners-hetzelfde-geslacht-bij-cbb/ https://www.culturu.com/nieuws/suriname/rechter-dwingt-cbb-om-huwelijken-van-gelijkgeslacht-in-te-schrijven/ https://abcsuriname.com/kantonrechter-oordeelt-cbb-moet-homo-stellen-inschrijven-in-huwelijksregister/ https://www.nu.nl/buitenland/6345855/suriname-moet-na-vonnis-homo-echtparen-inschrijven-bij-burgerlijke-stand.html https://vids.sr/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Suriname_Civil-Society-Report-FINAL.pdf https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ https://www.dna.sr/media/19726/burgerlijk_wetboek.pdf https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ |
Show Difference |
Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Value | Banned | Unrecognized |
Start Date | Feb 1, 2023 | (unknown) |
Description | The Constitutional Court of Suriname refused to recognize marriage of same-sex couple which was performed in Argentina. The court ruled that the ban on same-sex marriage does not violate the constitution or Suriname's obligations under the Interamerican Convention on Human Rights. | In 2023, the Constitutional Court of Suriname assessed the decision of the Central Bureau for Civil Affairs (CBB) not to recognize a marriage of a same-sex couple performed in Argentina and ruled that it did not violate Articles 8 and 17(1) of the Constitution. Moreover, the Court ruled that Article 80 of the Suriname Civil Code, which defines marriage as between one man and one woman, must be interpreted to prohibit polygamy rather than same-sex marriage. This interpretation suggests that the article does not inherently conflict with the rights of same-sex couples to marry. |
Show Difference | ||
Sources | https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ | https://vids.sr/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Suriname_Civil-Society-Report-FINAL.pdf https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ https://www.dna.sr/media/19726/burgerlijk_wetboek.pdf https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ |
Show Difference |
edited by Unknownmiles. banned is a better status since they refused to recognize the marriage
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Value | Unrecognized | Banned |
Description | The Constitutional Court of Suriname refused to recognize marriage of same-sex couple which was performed in Argentina. The court ruled that the ban on same-sex marriage does not violate the constitution or Suriname's obligations under the Interamerican Convention on Human Rights. | The Constitutional Court of Suriname refused to recognize marriage of same-sex couple which was performed in Argentina. The court ruled that the ban on same-sex marriage does not violate the constitution or Suriname's obligations under the Interamerican Convention on Human Rights. |
Show Difference |
Old Value (Original) | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Value | Banned | Unrecognized |
Original entry | |
---|---|
Status | Banned |
Start Date | Feb 1, 2023 |
End Date | (none) |
Description | The Constitutional Court of Suriname refused to recognize marriage of same-sex couple which was performed in Argentina. The court ruled that the ban on same-sex marriage does not violate the constitution or Suriname's obligations under the Interamerican Convention on Human Rights. |
Sources | https://dwtonline.com/lgbtqia-gemeenschap-krijgt-bittere-pil-te-slikken/ |