Current Version
Region | North Dakota |
Issue | LGBT employment discrimination |
Status | Sexual orientation and gender identity |
Start Date | Jul 16, 2015 |
End Date | Oct 4, 2017 |
Description | The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has ruled that “[A]llegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex”, and are barred by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This ruling applies at both the state and federal levels. No statewide protections exist, but in 2015, the North Dakota Senate passed a bill which would've introduced protections for sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the bill failed in the North Dakota House of Representatives. |
Sources | http://www.washingtonblade.com/content/files/2015/07/EEOC-gay-Title-VII-decision.pdf http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking_in_historic_ruling_eeoc_finds_sexual_orientation_discrimination_is_already_illegal http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/07/16/eeoc-rules-anti-gay-workplace-bias-barred-under-existing-law/ http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2015/02/north-dakota-senate-endorses-lgbtinclusive-anti-discrimination-bill/ |
Revision History (2)
edited by jadeywadey. improved description
Helpful?
0 Old Value (Original) | New Value (Current) | |
---|---|---|
Description | The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has ruled that “[A]llegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex”, and are barred by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This ruling applies at both the state and federal levels. | The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has ruled that “[A]llegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex”, and are barred by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This ruling applies at both the state and federal levels. No statewide protections exist, but in 2015, the North Dakota Senate passed a bill which would've introduced protections for sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the bill failed in the North Dakota House of Representatives. |
Show Difference | ||
Sources | http://www.washingtonblade.com/content/files/2015/07/EEOC-gay-Title-VII-decision.pdf http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking_in_historic_ruling_eeoc_finds_sexual_orientation_discrimination_is_already_illegal http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/07/16/eeoc-rules-anti-gay-workplace-bias-barred-under-existing-law/ | http://www.washingtonblade.com/content/files/2015/07/EEOC-gay-Title-VII-decision.pdf http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking_in_historic_ruling_eeoc_finds_sexual_orientation_discrimination_is_already_illegal http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/07/16/eeoc-rules-anti-gay-workplace-bias-barred-under-existing-law/ http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2015/02/north-dakota-senate-endorses-lgbtinclusive-anti-discrimination-bill/ |
Show Difference |
created by jadeywadey
Helpful?
1 Original entry | |
---|---|
Status | Sexual orientation and gender identity |
Start Date | Jul 16, 2015 |
End Date | Oct 4, 2017 |
Description | The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has ruled that “[A]llegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex”, and are barred by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This ruling applies at both the state and federal levels. |
Sources | http://www.washingtonblade.com/content/files/2015/07/EEOC-gay-Title-VII-decision.pdf http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking_in_historic_ruling_eeoc_finds_sexual_orientation_discrimination_is_already_illegal http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/07/16/eeoc-rules-anti-gay-workplace-bias-barred-under-existing-law/ |