Current Version
| Region | Alaska |
| Issue | Gender-affirming care |
| Status | Legal |
| Start Date | (unknown) |
| End Date | (none) |
| Description | Alaska had insurance explicitly restrict coverage for gender affirming care. There was a lawsuit against it, and Alaska must provide gender affirming care under insurance. There has been no specific laws on gender affirming care since. |
| Sources | https://alaskapublic.org/2021/07/01/alaska-medicaid-must-cover-gender-affirming-care-following-homer-womans-lawsuit/ https://legacy.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/being_ak_2020_being-vs-crum |
👍 NEW: Helpful votes! You can now rate each edit as helpful or unhelpful. Votes add another layer of approval and are an easy way to say thank you to other editors. Helpful votes may become public in the future but unhelpful votes will always remain private.
Revision History (1)
| Original entry | |
|---|---|
| Status | Legal |
| Start Date | (unknown) |
| End Date | (none) |
| Description | Alaska had insurance explicitly restrict coverage for gender affirming care. There was a lawsuit against it, and Alaska must provide gender affirming care under insurance. There has been no specific laws on gender affirming care since. |
| Sources | https://alaskapublic.org/2021/07/01/alaska-medicaid-must-cover-gender-affirming-care-following-homer-womans-lawsuit/ https://legacy.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/being_ak_2020_being-vs-crum |