Current Version
Region | Turkey |
Issue | LGBT employment discrimination |
Status | No protections |
Start Date | Sep 24, 2018 |
End Date | (none) |
Description | As a matter of fact , in the decision of the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 24.09.2018 and numbered 2015/35120 Main, 2018/19675 , it is emphasized that discrimination due to the sexual orientation of the worker is within the scope of the prohibition (although the concept of "sexual preference" is used with an incorrect terminology) : The prohibition of discrimination can be added to this, due to the employee's sexual preference that does not cause any adverse effects in the workplace. Again, discrimination based on factors such as political reasons and worldview should be protected.” However, despite this, discrimination still exists. |
Sources | https://haber.sol.org.tr/haber/isyerlerinde-ayrimciligin-hukuki-yaptirimi-nedir-8204 https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-court-issues-first-verdict-in-gay-garbage-men-case-140871 |
👍 NEW: Helpful votes! You can now rate each edit as helpful or unhelpful. Votes add another layer of approval and are an easy way to say thank you to other editors. Helpful votes may become public in the future but unhelpful votes will always remain private.
Revision History (12)
edited by Pizzaslices412653. Discrimination is common
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value (Current) | |
---|---|---|
Value | (REMOVED) | No protections |
Special Status | Ambiguous | No protections |
Description | As a matter of fact , in the decision of the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 24.09.2018 and numbered 2015/35120 Main, 2018/19675 , it is emphasized that discrimination due to the sexual orientation of the worker is within the scope of the prohibition (although the concept of "sexual preference" is used with an incorrect terminology) : The prohibition of discrimination can be added to this, due to the employee's sexual preference that does not cause any adverse effects in the workplace. Again, discrimination based on factors such as political reasons and worldview should be protected.” | As a matter of fact , in the decision of the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 24.09.2018 and numbered 2015/35120 Main, 2018/19675 , it is emphasized that discrimination due to the sexual orientation of the worker is within the scope of the prohibition (although the concept of "sexual preference" is used with an incorrect terminology) : The prohibition of discrimination can be added to this, due to the employee's sexual preference that does not cause any adverse effects in the workplace. Again, discrimination based on factors such as political reasons and worldview should be protected.” However, despite this, discrimination still exists. |
Show Difference |
edited by Pizzaslices412653. Most workers in Turkey get discriminated against.
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Sources | https://haber.sol.org.tr/haber/isyerlerinde-ayrimciligin-hukuki-yaptirimi-nedir-8204 | https://haber.sol.org.tr/haber/isyerlerinde-ayrimciligin-hukuki-yaptirimi-nedir-8204 https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-court-issues-first-verdict-in-gay-garbage-men-case-140871 |
Show Difference |
edited by Pizzaslices412653. There aren't any known laws that protect LGBTQ people from discrimination, making this ambiguous.
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Value | Sexual orientation only | (REMOVED) |
Special Status | Sexual orientation only | Ambiguous |
Description | As a matter of fact , in the decision of the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 24.09.2018 and numbered 2015/35120 Main, 2018/19675 , it is emphasized that discrimination due to the sexual orientation of the worker is within the scope of the prohibition (although the concept of "sexual preference" is used with an incorrect terminology) : The prohibition of discrimination can be added to this, due to the employee's sexual preference that does not cause any adverse effects in the workplace. Again, discrimination based on factors such as political reasons and worldview should be protected.” | As a matter of fact , in the decision of the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 24.09.2018 and numbered 2015/35120 Main, 2018/19675 , it is emphasized that discrimination due to the sexual orientation of the worker is within the scope of the prohibition (although the concept of "sexual preference" is used with an incorrect terminology) : The prohibition of discrimination can be added to this, due to the employee's sexual preference that does not cause any adverse effects in the workplace. Again, discrimination based on factors such as political reasons and worldview should be protected.” |
Show Difference |
edited by Buzdolabimotoru. Fixed information, law is still continues
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Start Date | (unknown) | Sep 24, 2018 |
End Date | Sep 24, 2018 | (none) |
edited by Pizzaslices412653. No protections
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Start Date | Sep 24, 2018 | (unknown) |
edited by Pizzaslices412653. There aren't any protections to discrimation to LGBT people
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
End Date | (none) | Sep 24, 2018 |
edited by Buzdolabimotoru. Law is still active
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
End Date | -0001 | (none) |
edited by im_h_DEACTIVATED
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
End Date | (none) | -0001 |
edited by Buzdolabimotoru
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Start Date | (unknown) | Sep 24, 2018 |
End Date | Sep 24, 2018 | (none) |
Reports (1)
- Status is not correct "If you ban LGBT members from Employment, you not be punished."
edited by Pizzaslices412653
Helpful?
0 Old Value | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Start Date | Sep 24, 2018 | (unknown) |
End Date | (none) | Sep 24, 2018 |
Old Value (Original) | New Value | |
---|---|---|
Value | Sexual orientation and gender identity | Sexual orientation only |
created by Buzdolabimotoru
Helpful?
0 Original entry | |
---|---|
Status | Sexual orientation and gender identity |
Start Date | Sep 24, 2018 |
End Date | (none) |
Description | As a matter of fact , in the decision of the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation dated 24.09.2018 and numbered 2015/35120 Main, 2018/19675 , it is emphasized that discrimination due to the sexual orientation of the worker is within the scope of the prohibition (although the concept of "sexual preference" is used with an incorrect terminology) : The prohibition of discrimination can be added to this, due to the employee's sexual preference that does not cause any adverse effects in the workplace. Again, discrimination based on factors such as political reasons and worldview should be protected.” |
Sources | https://haber.sol.org.tr/haber/isyerlerinde-ayrimciligin-hukuki-yaptirimi-nedir-8204 |