Entry #10210: Censorship of LGBT issues in Democratic Republic of the Congo

Current Version

RegionDemocratic Republic of the Congo
IssueCensorship of LGBT issues
StatusState-enforced
Start DateJan 30, 1940
End Date(none)
DescriptionWhile no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions in the 1940 Penal Code, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government.

Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.
Sourceshttps://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/
https://web.archive.org/web/20220119193936/https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/69343/85592/F-1734190547/COD-69343%20(CONSOLID).pdf


Revision History (7)

edited by DaisyGeekyTrans. Adding more information.

Helpful?
0
Old Value New Value (Current)
Value(REMOVED)State-enforced
Special StatusAmbiguousState-enforced
Start Date(unknown)Jan 30, 1940
DescriptionThe U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that
While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government.
Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.
While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions in the 1940 Penal Code, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government.

Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.
Show Difference
The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government. Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals. While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions in the 1940 Penal Code, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government. Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.
Sourceshttps://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/
https://web.archive.org/web/20220119193936/https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/69343/85592/F-1734190547/COD-69343%20(CONSOLID).pdf
Show Difference
https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/ https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220119193936/https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/69343/85592/F-1734190547/COD-69343%20(CONSOLID).pdf

edited by Pizzaslices412653. No known records found

Helpful?
0
Old Value New Value
ValueImprisonment as punishment(REMOVED)
Special StatusImprisonment as punishmentAmbiguous

edited by Canadianstudent03. There is unfair Censorship to LGB in DRC

Helpful?
0
Old Value New Value
ValueNo censorshipImprisonment as punishment
DescriptionNo official censorship.The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that
While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government.
Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.
Show Difference
No official censorship. The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that While no law specifically prohibits consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults, individuals engaging in public displays of consensual same-sex sexual conduct, such as kissing, were sometimes subject to prosecution under public indecency provisions, which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. A local NGO reported authorities rarely took steps to investigate, prosecute, or punish officials who committed abuses against LGBTQI+ persons, whether in the security forces or elsewhere in the government. Identifying as LGBTQI+ remained a cultural taboo. LGBTQI+ individuals were subjected to harassment, stigmatization, and violence, including "corrective" rape. Some religious leaders, radio broadcasts, and political organizations played a key role in supporting discrimination against LGBTQI+ individuals.

edited by Pizzaslices412653. Censorship is not official

Helpful?
-1
Old Value New Value
ValueState-enforcedNo censorship
Reports (1)
  • Newer law has been passed "The DRC Government has issued a warning to media outlets to not promote LGBT issues in the country"

edited by Pizzaslices412653. No actual censorship

Helpful?
-1
Old Value New Value
ValueImprisonment as punishmentState-enforced
DescriptionThe U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that individuals who publicly engaged in same-sex consensual activities, such as, for example, kissing, were sometimes prosecuted under public indecency provisions "which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples.No official censorship.
Show Difference
The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that individuals who publicly engaged in same-sex consensual activities, such as, for example, kissing, were sometimes prosecuted under public indecency provisions "which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples. No official censorship.

edited by JohnQuebec98. Not enough information is shown on this country

Helpful?
1
Old Value (Original) New Value
ValueNo censorshipImprisonment as punishment
DescriptionIn Democratic Republic of the Congo, there are no laws restricting the discussion or promotion of LGBTQ+ topics.The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that individuals who publicly engaged in same-sex consensual activities, such as, for example, kissing, were sometimes prosecuted under public indecency provisions "which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples.
Show Difference
In Democratic Republic of the Congo, there are no laws restricting the discussion or promotion of LGBTQ+ topics. The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Report found that individuals who publicly engaged in same-sex consensual activities, such as, for example, kissing, were sometimes prosecuted under public indecency provisions "which were rarely applied to opposite-sex couples.
Sourceshttps://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

created by equaldex

Helpful?
0
Original entry
StatusNo censorship
Start Date(unknown)
End Date(none)
DescriptionIn Democratic Republic of the Congo, there are no laws restricting the discussion or promotion of LGBTQ+ topics.
Sources(empty)